Skip to main content
COMPEL Body of Knowledge
Get Certified Platform

COMPEL Glossary / agentic-risk-tiering

Agentic risk tiering

The mapping of an agent's autonomy level, operating domain, and potential-harm profile to a risk tier that determines control requirements — approval depth, oversight mode, audit cadence, insurance, and kill-switch provisioning.

What this means in practice

COMPEL's agentic risk tiering overlays EU AI Act Annex III classifications with operational-impact signals specific to agents.

Synonyms

agentic risk classification , agent-tier mapping

Related Terms Network

This diagram shows how Agentic risk tiering connects to other concepts in the COMPEL body of knowledge. Each linked node is a term you can explore in turn.

Related terms for Agentic risk tiering Network graph showing 4 related glossary terms connected to Agentic risk tiering. Agentic risk t… Agent auto… High-risk … Human over… Agent Gove…
4 related concepts connected to Agentic risk tiering.

The COMPEL Glossary Graph visualizes relationships between framework terminology, showing how concepts interconnect across domains, stages, and pillars. Term nodes cluster by pillar affiliation while cross-references reveal semantic dependencies — for example, how risk appetite connects to control effectiveness, model governance, and assurance requirements. This network representation helps practitioners navigate the framework vocabulary and understand that COMPEL terminology forms a coherent conceptual system rather than isolated definitions.

Accessible list of related terms
  • Agent autonomy spectrum — The continuum along which agentic AI systems operate — from single-turn assistance through tool-augmented reasoning to fully autonomous multi-step execution — typically described with named gradations (Level 0 through Level 5).
  • High-risk AI system — Under Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, an AI system falling under Article 6(1) because it is a safety component of, or is itself, a product covered by Annex I Union harmonization legislation, or under Article 6(2) because its use case falls within Annex III — unless exempted by the Article 6(3) derogation..
  • Human oversight (Art. 14) — Under Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, the provider-designed measures that allow natural persons to understand the capacities and limitations of a high-risk AI system, monitor its operation, and intervene or interrupt it.
  • Agent Governance Pack — An executive-grade, living artefact aggregating all governance records for a deployed agent — autonomy classification, delegation and authority chain, oversight design, tool bindings, memory scope, kill-switch wiring, risk tier, incident history, and named owners.

See also

  • Agent autonomy spectrum — The continuum along which agentic AI systems operate — from single-turn assistance through tool-augmented reasoning to fully autonomous multi-step execution — typically described with named gradations (Level 0 through Level 5).
  • High-risk AI system — Under Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, an AI system falling under Article 6(1) because it is a safety component of, or is itself, a product covered by Annex I Union harmonization legislation, or under Article 6(2) because its use case falls within Annex III — unless exempted by the Article 6(3) derogation..
  • Human oversight (Art. 14) — Under Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, the provider-designed measures that allow natural persons to understand the capacities and limitations of a high-risk AI system, monitor its operation, and intervene or interrupt it.
  • Agent Governance Pack — An executive-grade, living artefact aggregating all governance records for a deployed agent — autonomy classification, delegation and authority chain, oversight design, tool bindings, memory scope, kill-switch wiring, risk tier, incident history, and named owners.